This is the most challenging question to answer when determining if an activity meets the definition of regulated research. A study that is designed to develop or contribute to generalizable knowledge applies and/or expands upon existing scholarly or scientific knowledge and will support conclusions that hold (generalize) across contexts and populations.
Several common activities involving human subjects and systematic data collection are similar to regulated research but do not satisfy this criterion. Examples include Quality Improvement, Quality Assurance, Program Evaluation, and Needs Assessment. These projects usually intend to to seek feedback about and/or improve upon a specific program or process within a specific, limited setting.
Relatedly, a project involving data collection may occur within the context of a class assignment with the goal of contributing to a student's educational experience (e.g., to learn about research methods). Such projects rarely satisfy this criterion because they are not intended to contribute to generalizable knowledge.
Please note that the intent to publish or present the findings of a project does not in and of itself determine whether a project was designed to contribute to generalizable knowledge.
Click 'Next' to continue.